Gator-f__custom_

Year2

May 05, 2008 Jul 18, 2008 3 307

I am a graduate of the University of Florida with both a BS and MS in Decision and Information Sciences. I lived my entire life in Florida up until January, 2008 when I moved to Charlotte, NC for a job. I was born and raised a Gator, and still remain a devoted Gator to this day.

I run the blog year2.wordpress.com, contribute on Bleacher Report, and have had opinion articles published in the Orlando Sentinel.

a fan of

Cincinnati Reds Major League Baseball Team

Orlando Magic National Basketball Association Team

Tampa Bay Buccaneers National Football League Team

Florida Gators NCAA Men's Football Division 1A Team

Florida Gators NCAA Men's Basketball Division 1 Team

rss icon RSSUser Blog

Mark Richt's Record Broken Down

Hello, Dawg faithful. I've been doing some coach record analysis lately, and yesterday I got to Mark Richt. If you want to see my whole analysis and interpretation it's here; if you get past some light ribbing near the beginning you probably won't have a problem with it.

But, the main deal is a table that breaks down his record by site, and another that breaks down his record by quality of opponent. Only games against I-A competition were included.

I give you the tables here if you want to provide your own analysis, though I think Kyle's well-documented fondness for him probably covers the sentiment pretty well.

By site:

Site Wins Losses Totals
Home 34 7 41
Away 25 4 29
Neutral 4 6 10
Bowls 5 2 7
Totals 68 19 87

 

The neutral site games are the annual Florida game in Jacksonville and the SEC championship games Richt has been to.

Here is by tier of opponent. A first tier opponent is a team that finished the year with a winning percentage of .750 or better, a second tier opponent finshed from .500 to .749, a third tier opponent finished .250 to .499, and a fourth tier opponent finished .249 and below.

Tier Wins Losses Pct. Avg. Scored Avg. Allowed
First 9 10 .474 24 21
Second 32 8 .800 28 18
Third 18 1 .947 28 13
Fourth 9 0 1.000 37 14

 

Not too shabby, eh? If I were a betting man (and if I was, I'm sure Richt would frown on me for it), I'd probably wager that he'll pass up Vince Dooley the coach by the time he's done.

See y'all in Jacksonville in November, and may you have the best season that the second place team in the SEC East can have.

5 comments | 0 recs

Breakdown of Neuheisel's Complete Record

Hey all. This site does a great job at covering UCLA and for someone like me who has never lived a day outside the eastern time zone, it's a window into UCLA's world.

Anyway, I've been doing some analysis of coaching records for some guys down on my side of the country. I know that Rick Neuheisel's record has been a subject of much debate, so I went ahead and plugged his numbers at both Colorado and Washington into my spreadsheet and let the formulas do the rest.

I mean only to provide stats; I'll let you all do the interpretation since y'all know the guy better than I do.

Continue reading this post »

7 comments | 1 recs

Ohio State and Playoffs

Here's a thought: Buckeye fans should be some of the most vocal playoff proponents.

Ohio State has gotten a bad rap lately, as SMQ has pointed out so eloquently on the main page. It has been to 3 of the past 6 BCS title games, and has one of the highest winning percentages of the decade.

However, thanks to two bad losses in the last two BCS title games, they're equated with the early '90s Buffalo Bills. You know who else has two bad losses at that level in the past two years? UCLA men's basketball. The Bruins lost badly to Florida in the past two Final Fours, but instead of being a national joke they're held up as an example of a great program. Sure, there's pressure on them to win it all this year, but no one is calling them the Bills.

The difference is that UCLA made its way to those bad losses via a playoff. Ohio State got voted in to the title games, and there were definite questions last year surrounding the team given the national negative perception of its conference. Plus, they basically backed into the contest because following a bad loss to Illinois they won a nondescript game over Michigan and watched the national carnage propel them back up.

If we had a playoff the last two years, it's entirely possible the Buckeyes could have lost without even making the title game. However, if they did make it there both years the public perception would be that they earned their way there, and they just happened to get caught in a bad matchup both times. It's also entirely possible that a playoff-forged matchup between the Buckeyes and Gators in 2006 would have made OSU take UF more seriously and everyone would be talking about 2 titles in 5 years instead of invoking Scott Norwood's team when talking about them.

Ohio State's fans should be in favor of a playoff for this very reason. Vocally so. After all, an 11-1 Ohio State team with only a road loss to USC would have a powerful case for going to the national title game in any year this decade, but if there's 2 other 11-1 teams I can't help but feel that people will vote OSU #3 based on perceptions made from the last two years. But, when opinion polls and beauty contests rule the postseason system, these are the things that could happen.

Stand up Buckeyes. It's time you made a real playoff push.

Disclosure: I am a Florida Gator, and even run Florida-centered blog.

19 comments | 0 recs

Site Meter