Sunday Morning Quarterback: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Is Norv Turner the Problem? Bar-right-arrows



We Still Have a Problem Here

Three Minnesota players were charged with rape last April, with XXX details online courtesy the Minnesota Star-Tribune. Prosecutors had a woman flagging them down at Burger King at six in the morning, testimony of drinking contests gone wrong, at least one head knocked against a bathtub, cell phone cameras recording strategically-emitted bodily fluids, and, seemingly, a pretty good case against the players.

Then again, so did prosecutors of alleged mass rapes by Colorado football players and the notorious Duke lacrosse players, and of Kobe Bryant, and none of those more famous cases ever went to trial. For political/culture war reasons, Duke LaCrosse was cleared a thousand times over. Thinking we've seen way more smoke than fire on this front lately, I wrote this about the then-pending Minnesota case a little more than a year ago:

As of noon Monday, recent history tells us [the accused players] should be most concerned long term with just what their lawyers claimed: their reputations.

Is that okay? In this specific case, maybe, depending on the innocence or guilt of each accused individual. But in what might be called "major" rape allegations, those with a great deal of national attention and usually involving a group of athletes, the verdict has wound up consistently "not guilty" in the past half-decade without the commencement of a single trial. Which is the larger problem: that athletes are continually drug through the dirt by false rape accusations -- what I gauge as the default public sentiment sans charges [against] Bryant and Duke lacrosse and, depending on who you ask, Colorado football players -- or that they keep getting off for it?
- - -


Jones: Fourth degree criminal sexual conduct = Victory.
- - -
Last week, one of the players, cell phone star Dominic Jones, was convicted of a lesser charge of "unwanted sexual conduct" that probably won't include jail time. That's a conviction, for a change, even if the defendant himself said he considered the verdict a victory. As the student Minnesota Daily points out in a sympathetic catch-up, the three other Gophers arrested and named in the case never had charges filed against them, were kicked off the team and, in two cases, left the university altogether. Dominic Jones, the one player actually found guilty, still has his athletic scholarship and plans to finish his degree.

The same day that article appeared, the Daily Collegian in State College reported disgraced Penn State running back Austin Scott may sue prosecutors after his much-publicized sexual abuse charge was dropped last Friday, when a judge ruled prior allegations of rape by Scott's accuser would be admissable in court. Scott's lawyer specifically brought up the case of his old teammate, Scott Paxson, who had a similar sexual assault charge dropped in the same court in 2006, and who also threatened civil action, as evidence of "a terrible pattern of prosecutorial abuse."

There's only one other D-I football rape case I recall mentioning since I started SMQ in 2005 that did go to trial: against Navy quarterback Lamar Owens, who was court martialed for sexual assault in 2006. He was found not guilty. The Seattle Times' balleyhooed exposé on the evils of Washington football under Rick Neuheisel made every attempt to make Jerramy Stevens look guilty (no one who takes the paper's account at face value could reasonably disagree), but his case, too, never went to trial.

Newspapers will never -- probably should never -- stop publishing the names of anyone arrested or charged with a felon, but sometimes it seems they should include a disclaimer reminding readers that the accused are "innocent until proven guilty." Charges go away; huge black stains on a person's reputation do not. Again, something is wrong here: either athletes are being repeatedly falsely accused of rape, or they're repeatedly getting away with it. Or both.

Update [2008-4-22 14:49:49 by SMQ]: Another charge from last weekend:

Boston College suspended defensive end Brady Smith after he was charged with on-campus sexual assault and breaking and entering.

School spokesman Jack Dunn said the 20-year-old Finksburg, Md., resident is alleged to have committed the offenses either Saturday evening or early Sunday.

The Boston Herald reported Sunday that coach Jeff Jagodzinski had announced Smith was indefinitely suspended from the team for violating team rules. He did not elaborate.
- - -

Breaking and entering would seem to eliminate the ambiguity associated with "date rape," but again, as they say in law school, IUPG.

- - -
Hat tip on this week's Daily Collegian and Minnesota Daily stories to the Wizard of Odds, as usual.

0 recs | Comment 6 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

both
http://www.royalsreview.com

by royalsreview on Apr 22, 2008 12:55 PM EDT   0 recs

Outstanding
SMQ,

I thought the article by City Journal was incredibly insightful.  As someone who has recently graduated college in the last few years it is amazing how far universities have veered off the course of teaching.  Fraternities and athletes are constantly made to attend courses on safe-sex and rape at my university.  I know my particular university had a similar issue where two young men were charged with rape and kicked off campus.  They ended up also being not guilty and sued successfully against the university.  

I am not sure what the answer is as far as the media is concerned.  They will always cover these things as long as they garner attention from the public.   I think the problem as far as the national media goes is that they come into these situations and already are assuming guilt.  You see it in the way they cover the stories.  I was shocked in watching the Duke case, where there were serious holes in the story from the beginning.

by Kennybk483 on Apr 22, 2008 2:37 PM EDT   0 recs

constantly?
Yes. The Universities have soooo veered from teaching that they make frats and jocks, who are obviously directly tied to education and learning, clearly, attend seminars. Yes, its the PC administrators that have destroyed education. Yes.

I have to disagree with the premise that there is a trend here. The only thing tying these stories together is that they were reported, and that college football fans will remember them, because they are college football fans. There's also quite a lot of coverage of ACT scores, Nick Saban's ethics, armed robberies, on-field leadership, how arrogant Charlie Weis is, etc. And thanks to the internet, none of it ever goes away, it just proliferates.

Some of these guys are very bad dudes. (and no... there's no evidence of a correlation between testosterone levels and violent crime, no, none at all, none whatsoever, ohh, wait...) Some of them are angels who were framed by evil women. Most are somewhere in between. However, strange case histories are not unique to college athletes. Weird stuff happens, people's motivations change, the human element of juries and bad (or good) lawyers come into play, deals get made, etc. etc.

The world is a very messy place, but I'm not sure the solution is just not covering these stories.

http://www.royalsreview.com

by royalsreview on Apr 22, 2008 3:50 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Agree
I hope I did not try and simplify the argument too much.  It is difficult when you are dealing with an issue as complex as this to describe something in a few sentences.  

Also, I am not saying that the media should not cover these stories.  I was just trying to point out the inequity in the way they report things.  I like how SMQ was doing the follow up on these stories.  Anyways, I hope I did not try and simplify things and pretend that athletes are angels (except for my school where we only recruit young men of character, of course).  My opinion is from the perspective of a young white male, take it for what it is worth.

by Kennybk483 on Apr 22, 2008 4:19 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

in the case
of Minnesota - it's not shocking that the Gopher athletic department would toss these guys aside like trash because the University of Minnesota has for many years been concerned more about appearance than substance.

The athletic department can't make up it's mind if it stands for something or not - they've had a relatively large number of NCAA violations while at the same time they go and do this kind of crap in the name of protecting the University's image.

Corn - It's Good for You!
http://www.cornnation.com

by Corn Nation on Apr 22, 2008 7:27 PM EDT   0 recs

Accountability
The increased attention brings increased accountability. I'm sure in the past before 24/7 news that incidents like these would get swept under the rug or settled quickly and quietly to avoid scandal.

The problem is that 24/7 news tends to sensationalize things, and it also gives attention-seekers a forum. How many people from outside Durham showed up to protest the Duke LaCrosse case? It was a local story, involving local people, but it could sell headlines so it became national news. Throw in the historical subplot about race in the South, and you've got a gold mine for media companies.

Ultimately, it's impossible at this point to put the cat back in the bag. College athletes committing crimes are national news both in the traditional media and the blogosphere (see Fulmer Cup). I'm not blaming the media per se, since its role is to attract attention to important issues like crime. It's the way the media goes about it though, with breathless reporting and interviews with shameless grandstanders, that crosses the line and makes things worse.

by Year2 on Apr 23, 2008 9:27 AM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed



Site Meter