Blog Pollin': Final Regular Season Ballot
The penultimate poll of the season – we know about as much as we’re going to know.
| 1. | LSU (11-2) |
| 2. | Ohio State (11-1) |
| 3. | Oklahoma (11-2) |
| 4. | Missouri (11-2) |
| 5. | Georgia (10-2) |
| 6. | Kansas (11-1) |
| 7. | Virginia Tech (11-2) |
| 8. | West Virginia (10-2) |
| 9. | Southern Cal (10-2) |
| 10. | Boston College (10-3) |
| 11. | Arizona State (10-2) |
| 12. | Florida (9-3) |
| 13. | Illinois (9-3) |
| 14. | South Florida (9-3) |
| 15. | Hawaii (12-0) |
| 16. | Tennessee (9-4) |
| 17. | Clemson (9-3) |
| 18. | Oregon (8-4) |
| 19. | Wisconsin (9-3) |
| 20. | Cincinnati (9-3) |
| 21. | Virginia (9-3) |
| 22. | Texas (9-3) |
| 23. | Auburn (8-4) |
| 24. | BYU (10-2) |
| 25. | Connecticut (9-3) |
- - -

If I was the Associated Press, and this were pre-1968, LSU would be mythical champion. But I’m not, and it’s not. So calm down, coach.
- - -
I’m pained by bumping Hawaii all the way to 15th, up seven slots from last week after mediocre, last-second win over oft-whipped Pac Ten lump Washington, but atrocious as the Warriors’ schedule was and is and will still be even following the Sugar Bowl, it’s a motley series of would-have-beens behind them. Tennessee and Oregon each lost Saturday for the fourth time apiece, the third L in a row for the post-Dixon Ducks, and Virginia’s habit of tripping ahead of its opponent at the finish line is well documented. Clemson, Wisconsin, Cincinnati and Auburn each have one pretty good win (Florida State, Michigan, South Florida) but also one inexcusable loss (Georgia Tech, Penn State by a mile, Louisville, and Mississippi State), and little else to fully cancel out the multiple losses to more competent teams. Texas, in addition to losing to Kansas State and Texas A&M, did not beat any team better than Texas Tech. Hawaii is still completely dubious but finally a modest benefactor of its consistency (it also helps that Fresno State hammered KSU for its eighth win, adding another quasi-quality team to Boise State and, uh, Washington).
Bad news for the Big Ten, which, with Michigan and Penn State looking on from the "Waiting..." section, only landed four three teams in the poll itself, half as many as the Big East or ACC, for crying out loud. This is probably largely due to the conference’s dreadful mark outside of the conference, which may not be totally fair but is what it is. Which is bad: with Notre Dame creating an unexpectedly worthless void on the slates of Michigan, Penn State, Michigan State and Purdue, the conference’s best non-conference win was probably MSU over Pittsburgh, or Wisconsin’s opening day win over Washington State. Illinois and Michigan were the only teams with the chance to deliver anything meatier than that, and both came up short against Illinois and Oregon, respectively. No team other team in the Big Ten even played another BCS conference team wth a winning record. I don’t hold this against the entire league, just, you know, every individual team in it. You reap what you sow, and the Big Ten reaped a little too much MAC – still, do not even think about trying to conflate a weak set of three-four games per team with the weak set of opponents Hawaii saw every week all season long. All of the Big Ten teams appearing in the poll and in the "Waiting..." section have quality wins over one another, and I won’t turn back on that.
As always, everything will be different next time, which is like, a month. Stay tuned.
0 recs |
7
comments
Comments
Error?
by SpartanDan on Dec 4, 2007 12:38 AM EST 0 recs
Undervaluing Home Field Advantage?
by Andy Imboden on Dec 4, 2007 8:09 AM EST 0 recs
What?
by SMQ on
Dec 4, 2007 8:33 AM EST
up
0 recs
Fine.
by Andy Imboden on
Dec 4, 2007 1:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
Losing to PSU isn't terrible
by SpartanDan on
Dec 4, 2007 12:22 PM EST
up
0 recs
I have to agree
Losing by 31, on the other hand, is... not good. As a point of comparison, there were nine other 3-loss teams in the final BCS top-25. No less than six lost all three combined by 31 points or less.
by peachy on
Dec 4, 2007 6:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
Huh?
I don't get that train of thought.
If no Big Ten team has a quality win out-of-conference, how can we say with any legitimate certainty that ANY of those teams are any good? Because they have big stadiums and recruits that get lots of stars from the services?
How can one assume Illinois beating Penn State, for example, is a "quality win", when Penn State didn't beat anyone out-of-conference of note? Maybe all of these teams - as I've suggested all year - are equally mediocre. I think it's telling when the second-best team in the conference for the large portion of the year got beat by a 1-AA school at home and lost by 30+ to Oregon.
by sodakboy93 on Dec 4, 2007 6:12 PM EST 0 recs






