No More Mr. Nice Guy: Bower Fired at Southern Miss
Jeff Bower was fired this morning, two days after securing his 14th straight winning season at Southern Miss, per "sources close to the program" or "a member of the football staff." My dad, a USM alum who spent a year decades ago as an assistant with Bower, thinks this is "just awful." I don’t know.
His will be the widespread sentiment even among partisans with no such personal ties, because as long as Bower has been the face of a regional, non-mystique program like Southern Miss, it felt like you knew him. He’s just a guy in manner and speech, and ostensibly deserves some loyalty – he was a successful quarterback at USM in the seventies, an assistant for most of the next decade and a half and his teams in the late nineties were good enough to finish in the top 20 twice (1997 and 1999), shut out Alabama and inch within a couple spots of the top ten as late as November (2000) and dominate its new conference, as good a five-year run as any coach has ever had in Hattiesburg, and good enough to draw serious overtures from bigger schools. Bower was rumored to be the man to replace Ray Goff at Georgia, his home state, but he didn’t go. He was true to his school, graduated his players at a terrific clip, never had a hint of NCAA scrutiny, and that, along with the consistent winning records and bowl games, turned Bower into a kind of low-key institution. Everything Lloyd Carr was to Michigan, Jeff Bower was to Southern Miss.
That analogy cuts both ways, though. As with Carr, despite the undeniable, admirable consistency, Bower’s greatest success is a decade behind him, and the coaching reaper has loomed larger with every new disappointment. Bigger schools have not called in years, not because everybody just knew he was so unwilling to go, but because Southern Miss football dropped off the map. The schemes never changed, the offense never rose from the bottom third of the national rankings; never five wins, true, but never ten, either. Three Conference USA titles in the league’s first four seasons were met with just one over the last eight, and the "winning record" streak consistently hinged on salvaging unfulfilling, 7-5 records against UAB, East Carolina or Arkansas State at the end of the year, even as Louisville and TCU bolted for greener pastures and a respectable league rapidly deteriorated into a midweek distraction, the MAC of the South, with no teams anywhere near the polls. His teams are 16-36 this decade against teams that finished with winning records, any teams, and of the big wins over BCS teams in that span – over Alabama and Oklahoma State in 2000, Ok. State again in 2001, Illinois in 2002, Nebraska in 2004, N.C. State in 2006 – only that Nebraska team (final record: 5-6 in Bill Callahan’s first season) even finished within a game of .500. The biggest victory of the last three seasons was an ordinary home win last year against Houston, which later avenged the loss in the conference championship.
The current team, returning an overwhelming number of starters off a division title in 2006, was the unanimous favorite to win C-USA in the summer, and I predicted it would win double digit games for the first time in Bower’s tenure. With a conference championship game and a bowl game on top of a twelve-game regular season, there was no excuse not to expect that kind of success against such a depleted conference with no other apparent challenger. This was not Bower’s worst team, but against that backdrop, it was his most disappointing. It’s not like the expectations are unrealistic, or that coaches are under a daily pressure cooker. USM is not the kind of place that pulls its hair out with every loss; it is excusable, for example, to lose at Boise State, which has lost once on its home field in five years. It is not excusable, however, to be thoroughly trounced without an ounce of fight or a clue on national television. And it certainly is not excusable under any circumstances – through whatever combination of injuriy, malaise, weather, disease, depression or famine – to follow that disgraceful performance with an all-time horror show of a defeat to winless and completely hapless Rice at home. Bower’s fate may have been sealed there – the subsequent loss to Central Florida was bad, and the subsequent loss to Memphis was bad, but to lose at home to Rice, Rice – Rice! – a team that actually managed to look more inept in victory that night than even its horrible numbers could convey, was the final, depressing link in the evolution from stale to absolutely putrid, the worst defeat of Bower’s career, and doubly unacceptable given the high goals the team still had intact to that point. The season was spoiled there, and with it possibly everything Bower had built Southern Miss to stand for as a mentally tough team that takes care of its business. Anything is possible after a loss to Rice. The bottom is suddenly, horrifyingly visible. There is another bowl game in three weeks, but clinging to an uninspring, six-point win over Arkansas State to secure a trip to the PapaJohns.com Bowl (it’s not sponsored by the restaurant chain, see, but by the web site of the restaurant chain) does not cleanse the foul taste of sub-mediocrity.

The look we know all to well.
- - -
Can they do better? Yes – briefly. A young hire that pays off in quick success is certainly possible, and will be great for the program in the short term, before he’s poached for big bucks by a bigger school on his way up the ladder. Mid-majors all want to make the splash hire, the Urban Meyer, Bobby Petrino, Steve Kragthorpe, Dennis Franchione, Dirk Koetter, Dan Hawkins who will take the program back into the polls, but the reality is that those coaches will move up quickly or, if they stay – like Bower or his nearest longtime parallels, Pat Hill at Fresno State and simultaneously-deposed Sonny Lubick at Colorado State – they will eventually succumb to the limitations of the location and drift back to the pack, and that coach will eventually stagnate and be forced out. See not only Bower and Lubick, but LaVell Edwards and Fisher DeBerry before them. Hill’s time will come. Chris Peterson will be paid lavishly soon to leave Boise State; ditto Bronco Mendenhall at BYU, or else his program will eventually move to the middle, too, as it did for Edwards. There are no exceptions to this.
I prefer Southern go the supernova route, hire a young, innovative guy and hope he pays spectacular dividends before moving on. At least we’d have those three or four great seasons and get a glimpse at the moon before descending back to Earth. Because in the long run, Southern Miss is just Southern Miss, and I don’t know that anyone can do a better job with that over an extended period of time than Jeff Bower.
(HT: Frequent commenter osuvandy)
0 recs |
31 comments
Comments
More on USM
In particular, since I KNOW that you still followed the team closely, (you watch too much crappy football that you don't have a rooting interest in to just arbitrarily quit watching Southern Miss even if they do lose to...shudder...Rice) I hope you'll provide extended coverage on their coaching search.
by Beatuofa on Nov 26, 2007 1:43 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
me too
by royalsreview on Nov 26, 2007 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Tough situation for AD.
Possible reason for decline of USM from 1990s is the rise to D1 from programs such as UAB, Troy, FI&AU, U LA La, ULM, etc. where Bower use to grab his talent. Fans think that the Coach should be able to still grab that talent year in and out. And some feel that his coaching has been passed up by the ever persistently changing game.
I for one am not happy about the situation, nor am I too sad. If he was fired, he was mistreated. I was more hoping for a resignation or retirement. But now that the day has come, a lot of people's stomach's are churning.
I think overall the last few recruiting classes have been better, but he already lost 2 of his "biggest" recruits from the his last class and is rumored to be losing his third.
The new coach will not be rebuilding from the ground up, and I hope that the next hire will turn out to be a strong one.
by Eagles Fan on Nov 26, 2007 2:28 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well said.
As a USM alum, I'm neither happy nor angry about coach Bower's departure - just resigned to the knowledge it had to be done. I wish him the best and hope we're able to find someone who can be at least as successful as he was while maintaining the high level of character that was Bower's signature.
by HarbingerGA on Nov 26, 2007 3:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A few comments
- As one of the five people who watched that USM-Rice game, SMQ did a pretty good job of describing it. It was wretched football by both teams that looked like it was played on a construction site. Are they rebuilding the end zones SMQ?
- As a Rice alum, that was one of the all time disses of Rice football. It's been bad (really bad at times), but they aren't FIU.
- Excellent job describing the quandary quality mid-major programs have in choosing a coach. Do you go with the Urban Meyer approach that has high risk (the guy never pans out and is fired 3 seasons later after winning 6 games--David Bailiff is coming to mind), high reward (a few good, maybe great seasons before departing for greener pastures) OR do you go with an elder retread that can bring some stability and credibility to the program, but will probably never win 9 games and may hang on a few seasons too long (Hi Ken Hatfield!). Tulane's hiring of Toledo comes to mind, UTEP with Price, etc. I agree with the taking a shot approach, especially if you have a very good AD (Rice did in Bobby May and took the worst D-1A athletic program in the country to spectacular heights considering the limitations and obstacles).
by DoubleB on Nov 26, 2007 3:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
They're expanding seating in the South end zone
by SMQ on Nov 26, 2007 3:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As a MSU fan, I tip my hat to
by aconstipatedmonkey on Nov 26, 2007 4:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow..
So, yes, USM was better than Rice and should have beaten them. But at least show some level of fairness to Rice--we are 9-7 in conference games over the last two years (since we abandoned the wishbone). We certainly want to improve and think we can and will, but we are not some patsy that you should be able to walk over just by rolling out the vaunted Golden Eagle helmet.
by Middle Ages on Nov 26, 2007 4:20 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Rolling out the helmer: Obviously not
Before the year, I wouldn't have said the same thing about Rice (7-6, Jarrett Dillard, etc.), but this team was 0-4 and not competitive. They were an undeniably pathetic team over those first four games. Disgraceful loss, the worst in Bower's tenure - USM has lost games it's not supposed to lose, but that was by far the worst - not just the loss, but the extreme ugliness of it, the lack of effort, and the comeback at the end that showed what a walkover it should have been all night - and I think it's what got him fired, actually. Southern has never lost a game to a team that far down the poll - not historically, but at that point, Rice was rock bottom. Sorry.
by SMQ on Nov 29, 2007 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No need to apologize
by Middle Ages on Nov 29, 2007 10:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
doubt it
As SMQ has already explained, Bower's performance here was pretty much par for the course and actually slightly below the bar set by his predecessors.
Quality coaches looking to make a name for themselves recognize the upside of going to a place where they know without question they can win. I've been pleasantly surprised by some of the names that have come up.
by Shawn1228 on Nov 29, 2007 11:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
a sad day
this sentence sums it up best. the "supernova route," although attractive, is littered with failures. i grew up going to southern miss games, and was a huge jeff bower fan. i hope he catches on somewhere and gets back to winning games. as for usm, they may very well end up reaping what they sow.
by gerry dorsey on Nov 26, 2007 5:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
My Advice
by Year2 on Nov 26, 2007 6:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I just don't get it...
I guess McCarney is available. Maybe they are trying to bring a second bit of Ames to the deep south... Dan could come in and give Larry someone to drink some Natty Light with while hanging out with the co-eds, I suppose.
by Brawndo on Nov 26, 2007 8:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Winning percentage
by SMQ on Nov 29, 2007 7:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Boise State effect?
In other words, USM is willing to gamble here for a guy who will get them to a BCS bowl, at the risk that the same guy could run the program into the ground. They'll take the chance of 11-1 at the risk of 3-9 rather than the safe, seven or eight wins and a minor bowl berth every year that they have under Bower. Unfortunately, 3-9 is more likely than the 11-1. I could see this blowing up in their faces the same way that firing David Cutcliffe to bring in Ed Orgeron did for Ole Miss.
by Tom on Nov 27, 2007 3:53 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
'It's not that Southern Miss has stagnated...'
by SMQ on Nov 27, 2007 8:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You got it, SMQ
The conventional perception, since Bower was the coach at the inception of CUSA and the rise of The Worldwide Leader, is that Jeff Bower invented Southern Miss football and has won bigger and more often than anyone to ever hold the position, when nothing could be farther from the truth. Crimeny, his very first game here was a bowl game with Brett Farve under center--our 2nd in 3 years back when bowls actually meant something. The coach prior to him (Curley friggin' Hallman) had a 10-win season and beat both Alabama and Auburn and lost to Georgia by a whisker during an 8-win season.
Of the 7 coaches including and since Pie Vann in 1949, Bower's winning percentage ranks 5th. The 14-winning-season streak is impressive and matched by few, but USM went from 1935 to 1967 under 3 different coaches without a losing season, so that's not exactly new here. We were the premiere Southern Independent long before Bower got here; the little team with the big heart that gave SEC teams fits and owned the likes of Louisville, Memphis, etc. Now we're the team that looks clueless vs. every good team we play and struggles vs. half the bad teams we play.
We are underachieving right now, have been for years, and--this is key--anyone who actually watches USM play week after week knows it. 7 wins are nice, but when there's no good reason it shouldn't have been 9 or 10, you owe it to your players and fans to make the corrections. Bower continually declined to change the way he does things, so it was finally his position that needed to be changed.
I get a good laugh at the guy on The Worldwide Leader calling the move "a real head-scratcher" after his network televised 3 wholly embarrassing conference losses this season--a season in which we were the consensus favorite to win the whole thing and a Sporting News pre-season top 25.
Coach Bower has done much for us, but excuse the hell out of us, world, for having higher expectations than 4th place in CUSA East and losing 3 out of 4 to Memphis.
by Shawn1228 on Nov 27, 2007 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
minor correction...
by Shawn1228 on Nov 27, 2007 12:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
These are a different kind of 7-5
by Roommate Guy on Nov 27, 2007 4:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Just another Rice Fan in Denial
There was a very annoying narrative going into that week that Rice was, and I quote, "..possibly the worst team in Divison I.." based on the first four games of the season (in which we were admittedly horrible), but ignoring the fact that we had/ have an all-american receiver in Jarett Dillard, the CUSA total offense leader in Chase Clement, were a one point loss from playing USM in the conference championship game the year before, and were a bowl team. Here is a hint: Just because a talking head on ESPN says something, it is not necessarily true.
Rice had a terrible year in its transition to its third coach in 3 years. USM was a better team and should have won this year---but the quality level of the two teams is not all that dissimilar- and if you disagree, you are the one in denial. I am willing to bet that the game next year in Houston will be close, and based on you guys having a new coach and our best players back that we will beat you again.
Think for yourself- don't rely on ESPN.
by Middle Ages on Nov 29, 2007 10:24 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If you insist on harping on this...
Which is a good sign that it was time to part ways with our coach.
I've got nothing at all against Rice. Your program has improved tremendously and there are good things happening. I hope you, as well as the rest of CUSA, starts kicking butt and taking names....BUT, considering where both teams were, say, 10 years ago, that Southern Miss has now met you in the middle is a horrible thing for us.
I assume you saw the game and thus also saw our level of our ineptitude (the Golden Boy deciding going in that our only backup QB should be an injured one who had hardly practiced all week, said QB turning the ball over 6 or 7 times alone). Even with that, Rice still only managed to win by a whisker. You guys definitely became a different team by the end of the season, but you were still the same old one on that particular night. I find myself wondering if Bailiff ever sent Bower a thank-you note for the jump-start.
by Shawn1228 on Nov 29, 2007 2:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh......okay --
1996- Rice 7-4, USM 8-3,
1997- Rice 7-4, USM 9-3,
1998- Rice 5-6, USM 7-5
USM was marginally better than Rice then.
Look- I am not arguing that Rice's program has been anywhere near as consistent as USM's over the last decade, but we haven't been going 0-11 every year either--which is what one might assume from the USM reaction to losing to Rice (the horrors!). Just because we were 0-4 going into that game doesn't mean we were 'arguably the worst team in college football' just because you read that in your paper. Rice had the same players as the bowl team in 2006, and who ended up averaging over 38 pts/ game in conference games. I did watch the game, and I was almost sick at the end as we almost gave it away.
I'm sorry that you guys bought into the hype and it made the loss that much harder to take. If we played right now, it would be a close game again, as I am sure it will next year.
by Middle Ages on Nov 29, 2007 5:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Sigh...let's start with the stats game
Southern Miss comes in at 26th all time with .596
Rice comes in 108th with a meager at best .442
You aren't really trying to say Southern is only marginally better, are you? What was Rice's best coaching era, the Ken Hatfield dynasty? Or maybe Todd Graham's one season? And SMQ will vouch for me when I say that the last time I watched ESPN was some dreadful USM loss...probably the one against Rice.
by Roommate Guy on Nov 29, 2007 6:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Missing the point
My only other comment on the stats you provided is that most of that .442 winning percentage was while we were in the Southwest Conference, so while I am not disagreeing with your overall point- that is not really an apples to apples comparison.
Hatfield was our best modern coaching era, aided by the fact that we had just moved from the SWC to the WAC. The Jess Neely era (way back) in the 50's-60's was our best era, with multiple SWC championships and New Year's Day bowl games.
by Middle Ages on Nov 30, 2007 10:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn, this is not the point
It's interesting that USM wound up statistically dominating that game - overwhelmingly, in terms of yards, first downs, etc. because Southern woke up in the fourth quarter and started a total massacre, which should have been happening all night. It was so bad prior to that, though, three full touchdown drives in six minutes wasn't even good enough.
A disgrace, not because it was Rice, in general, but this specific Rice team. It was that bad, though, there is no denying it. That game was the anvil that broke the camel's back.
by SMQ on Nov 29, 2007 7:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Last comment on this I promise.
I think your view was just colored by your expectations going into the game this year. If you read the language in your original post it does not seem to specify this Rice team vs. just a loss to Rice (Rice..Rice!)---"Anything is possible after a loss to Rice". BTW, you wrote that this week, not the day after the game.
And I'm sure I am overly sensitive to disrespect since it seems people (other people, not necessarily SMQ) have that same opinion of Rice no matter the year or the record. It seems to be SOP to call for your coach to be fired if you lose to Rice.
One last point and then I am done w/ this I promise. Look at games between common opponents for USM and Rice over the last two years:
2006
UCF- RU won 40-29, USM won 19-14
Tulsa- RU won 41-38, USM lost 20-6
UH- RU lost 31-30, USM won 31-27
ECU- RU won 18-17, USM lost 20-17
Tulane- RU lost 38-24, USM won 31-3
UAB- RU won 34-33, USM won 25-20
Both finished 3-2 against common opponents
2007
SMU- RU won 43-42, USM won 28-7
Marshall- RU lost 34-21, USM won 33-24
Memphis- RU lost 38-35, USM lost 29-26
UTEP- RU won 56-48, USM won 56-30
Head to head- RU won 31-29
Both finished 3-2 against common opponents.
Look- we played like s*t our first four games--3 of which were against Big 12 teams--and we had a very disappointing year. Four games does not a season.
To act like you guys are SO much better that Bower should be fired for a loss to us *I believe is selectively ignoring facts and relying on the old "Rice always sucks" narrative. I've seen it before.
Now I will quit beating the dead horse.
by Middle Ages on Nov 30, 2007 11:42 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here are the facts
USM -- 23rd in winning percentage at 64%
Rice -- 83rd in winning percentage at 44%
Not that close.
How about Sagrin ratings of teams from 1998 (as far back as I can find) through 2007:
USM Rice
2007 93 155
2006 52 88
2005 64 135
2004 73 107
2003 51 103
2002 68 118
2001 60 82
2000 40 107
1999 14 74
1998 35 56
Average ranking difference between the two schools -- 47.5 places.
Rice never finished higher than USM and in fact was never closer than the 21 place difference in 1998 (ten years ago) and the 22 place difference in 2001.
USM's worst finish, other than this year, was 73. Other than Rice's best finish (1998 with a 56), no other Rice season ranks higher than any USM season other than the current one.
These are the facts -- what are we ignoring?
However, you are correct that we should not resort to the "Rice always sucks" narrative. In fact, Rice sucked worse this year than it has in any other year over the last ten. This year's 155 rating was 20 places worse than Rice's previous worst showing (similarly USM 93rd was 20 places worse than its previous worst showing, no doubt influenced by a home loss to Rice).
USM was a 20 point favorite in the game against Rice this year. When was the last time Rice was a 20 point favorite over anyone?
Rice was 0-4 with a loss to a I-AA school. How can you not see this as an embarassing loss for USM?
by DukeEagle on Nov 30, 2007 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm Finished--good luck
In all sincerity, I hope you guys get a great coach and get back to where you guys think the program should be- all of CUSA needs that. Good luck in your bowl game and maybe I will see some of you guys in Houston next year.
Middle Ages
by Middle Ages on Nov 30, 2007 6:58 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rice
by mtobo on Nov 27, 2007 2:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know if he's available...
I'm going to be pimping Golden for all sorts of second-level jobs this year - hey, Duke - you interested in actually winning four games in a season before your current players become grandparents?
by sodakboy93 on Nov 28, 2007 1:09 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 




