THEY ALL FALL DOWN...UNTIL THE TWO-MINUTE DRILL

I don't think there's a lot of point in trying to reassess the Eagles' virtues after that sort of win - they may have left on uplifitng sentiment, an image of clumsy goodwill and guts (literally, in Matt Ryan's case) on the sideline after Ryan's winning touchdown pass, but the game in general defined the genre of "yes, but..." Yes, B.C. rallied for 14 points in four minutes in sloppy conditions to down a first rate defense in a first rate madhouse of a stadium, but it was only after 56 minutes of steady ass-kicking by the Hokies. Yes, B.C. survived the kind of impossible "team of destiny" game every champion has to endure at some point, but what are the odds of a similar push (there was the flubbed onside kick and everything) when the proceedings turn sour again down the line, as they almost inevitably will? Yes, Matt Ryan is a hero, a tough, vomiting hero, but his undeniable brilliance in the clutch only cancels out the rushed misfires that made up the great bulk of his first 39 attempts over more than three and a half quarters, which produced nothing. B.C. spent so long digging itself a hole on offense, the spectacular finish only got it back to 'even' in my mind.
I will say this for Ryan, who I apparently shortchanged before the game when I flippantly suggested he would be "the best player on the field, but only if he doesn't have to be." It was exactly the opposite: he was arguably the worst player, save possibly the outmanned freshman assigned to blocking Chris Ellis by himself, until there was no choice. And then he was virtually flawless.
Fifty percent of Boston College's total offense.
- - -
Tech partisans might be upset with the roomy secondary the Hokie defense showed on those drives, but its front four - and sometimes just three - had been relentlessly hounding Ryan all night, often in less obvious passing situations, without requiring help from the blitz. The Eagle offensive line stepped up, and with the extra time and confidence to stand and set his feet, the balls that had been sailing and fluttering on Ryan looked like they were guided by lasers fixed on his receivers' numbers. The first touchdown pass in the comeback was an amazing display of technique and precision; the game-winner was all vision and instinctual athleticism on the fly. It was one of the most remarkable, total in-game turnarounds I can remember.
But it doesn't leave me any more confident in the Eagles to run the table over their remaning four games, all against likely bowl teams, and with the conference championship beyond that. You can forget the first 56 minutes long enough to celebrate or wring a glowing profile of the all-American hero of the will, Matt Ryan, but Florida State, Maryland, Clemson and Miami can play defense, too, and B.C. won't get away with such an uneven performance again.

He's bobbling it, dude.
- - -
• Every week there are instances of vast disconnect between what I see (almost always backed up by what the booth announcers say they see) and what the officials looking at video deem "indisputable," and I'd like to note here for the record one of the truly ridiculous calls of the year, when officials rewarded and then inexplicably upheld Virginia Tech's only touchdown in the second quarter. The back judge on the field obviously had no idea where Eddie Royal's feet were in real time - it took him so long to consult with a colleague who had no position whatsoever to make a judgment that I wondered why they even bothered to make a call on the field at all; replay loomed from the second the ball left Sean Glennon's hands. And replay showed without question, from me or from the booth or from anyone with eyes, that Royal bobbled the ball and didn't control it against his body until his feet were a good six inches past the chalk, at minimum. It wasn't close, and because it basically handed the Hokies an extra four points when they should have been forced into a field goal, it dramatically changed the strategy at the end of the game.
At least they didn't follow up by calling an obviously in-bounds Rich Gunnell out on Boston College's first touchdown. Because that would have really sucked.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
BC/VT
On one hand, I see a gutty, NFL-type team, who makes just enough plays to win, and when winning is really what matters this year, I have to admire that, but on the other hand, I still see a team that if one, maybe two, things don't go their way, gets run by 28 against LSU/Florida/Oregon/OSU/OU.
As far as VT is concerned, goodness gracious, their games are hard to watch, and have been since Vick left in 2000. They are the epitomy of a NFL Herm Edwards/Tommy Tubberville team, yet even less exciting. This team gets up 3-0 and tries to ride that to the finish.
I know the weather was poor and that the coaches have zero confidence in their QB, but how many times did Glennon throw 4-5 yard passes on 3rd and 7+? Felt like 100 times. VT's game plan was to get to 9 or 10, close shop, and let the D, weather, and crowd to the rest (and it came back to bite them).
by Bry422 on Oct 26, 2007 8:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ryan
This was not a Flutie-like comeback as ESPN is trying to suggest. This was not a heroic, Heisman-defining performance like Craig James was trying to suggest. This was BC being completely outplayed and beaten up, followed by 4 inexplicable minutes of prevent defense by VT which allowed Ryan to complete more than twice as many passes of 10 or more yards than he had completed in the entire game up until then.
BC didn't win this game, VT gave it to them. FSU and Miami are worthless, so they are no threat, but Tommy Bowden always wins a few big games down the stretch to save his job after notching an otherwise disappointing season, so look for BC to lose at Clemson.
by Year2 on Oct 26, 2007 9:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BC
As a Clemson fan, there's nothing that truly scares me about playing this BC team Nov. 17. Well, maybe our penchant to gives games away, but I don't see BC just outright coming out and being able to take it from us. If it weren't for special teams last year, we would have beat this team WITH WILL PROCTOR. BC has won both games with us since they've joined the ACC, but the first one was by 3 in overtime, and the second one was by one in overtime. Even if we can't put ourselves in a position to possibly win the ACC Atlantic (we need BC to lose one other than us), I still think we should beat BC in the valley.
by CStiger on Oct 26, 2007 10:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ACC Refs
by chilltown1491 on Oct 26, 2007 10:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





