A Somewhat Obligatory Assessment of: California
A too-soon look at next fall, sans the inevitable injuries, suspensions and other pratfalls of the long offseason. By popular demand.
- - -
What’s Changed. Cal has a high-flying rep under Jeff Tedford, but the Bears have produced at least a 1,200-yard rusher every year of his tenure and were usually more run-oriented during his first four years -- the 2003 team ran 55 percent of the time, and the 2004 and ‘05 teams both ran on 60 percent of their snaps, a real smashmouth ratio. That’s changed dramatically the last two years, partly because the Bears were no longer averaging six yards per carry (as they did in ‘04 and ‘05), partly because they were in more losing efforts and partly because DeSean Jackson, Lavelle Hawkins and Robert Jordan represented one of the most athletic, experienced and productive receiving corps anywhere. That trio combined for 151 catches and 18 touchdowns in 2006, then went beyond their billing for 184 grabs and 15 scores last year. They were certainly an upgrade over their predecessors: the NFL only took one Cal receiver between 2002 and 2007 (Chase Lyman, whose college career was cut short by injuries and who failed to make even the slightest dent in Saints camp), but took Jackson last year in the second round and Hawkins in the fourth; Jordan signed a free agent deal with the 49ers.
2007 Record • Past Five Years
2007: 7-6 (3-6 Pac Ten; T-7th)
2003-07: 43-21 (26-16 Pac Ten)
Five-Year Recruiting Rankings*
2004-08: 34 • 23 • 9 • 19 • 22
Returning Starters, Roughly
12 (5 Offense, 7 Defense)
Best Player
When young quirky hat aficianado Alex Mack became accidentally contaminated with the experimental substance GC-161 at her father's chemical plant, she initially gained the ability to "zap" people and objects with an electrical charge, move objects by telekinesis, and morph into a silvery liquid. Since taking on the form of a 6'4" 310-pound all-Pac Ten center in order to gain admission to Berkeley, she's focused her superhuman abilities to become the both the strongest and most flexible player on the team and possibly the first center taken in next year's draft. Now it's up to the rest of the Golden Bears to make sure Jim Harbaugh doesn't lead corrupt Paradise Valley Chemical Plant CEO Danielle Atron to Alex's true identity, cuz you know he totally would.
Bizarre Tradition
Cal invented the "card stunt" in 1910, and has either taken to digitally altering the results or has just evolved into one impossibly precise card stunt machine, as seen before the 2006 Game with Stanford (whose famous band was, yes, banned):
.
I find that hard to believe, personally, having seen enough of the "enhanced" variety on behalf of athlete's foot cream in commercials, but I find no one else claiming fakery on this or any other "card stunt" clip, so there you go -- Cal students are just freakishly good at coordinating large scale sign movement (if anybody was, you'd figure it'd be Berkeley, I guess). Click here for the full-sized clip.
- - -
* According to Rivals.
Still, as struggles elsewhere on the offense put a greater strain on their responsibility -- namely, Nate Longshore was playing hurt, again (see below) -- the receivers were far less explosive last year. Jackson averaged 16 yards per catch as a freshman and a truly frightening 18 in ‘06, but only 11.7 in ‘07; Hawkins’ average fell from 15.3 as a first-year JUCO transfer to a pedestrian 11.9. Overall, yards per pass fell by a full yard from ‘06 to ‘07 and the number of big plays plummeted (from 40 in ‘06 to 26 last year, a drop of 35 percent), especially in Pac Ten games. The scoring average fell just below 30 per game, a field goal worse than the previous Tedford era low, in 2003. The balance remained, but it was generally a less explosive outfit as the season wore on, which is shown well in its inability to score more than 23 points in any of the last six regular season games, including clunkers against league bottom dwellers Washington State (a 20-17 win), Washington (a 37-23 loss) and, most inexcusably, Stanford (a 20-13 loss).
The bad news from that perspective is that both the most reliable and most explosive players have all gone on to the pros, and the immediate reserves are not as highly regarded -- though Jordan wasn’t a high profile recruit, Hawkins was a four-star prospect out of junior college and Jackson was the hands-down, must-have receiving star of the class of 2005, whereas expected replacements Jeremy Ross, Michael Calvin and senior LaReyelle Cunningham generated far less hype (and, so far, even less on-field production). If the Bears are looking for a new field-stretching athlete, it’s likely to come from among a group of guys who haven’t taken a snap: Florida transfer/serial legal risk Nyan Boateng or true freshman Marvin Jones. Otherwise, the focus of the attack is likely to shift back to the much-anticipated running of Jahvid Best, or whoever’s next in Tedford’s tailback parade.
What’s the Same. Last year’s defense also happened to be the most generous of Tedford’s tenure in terms of points allowed, and second-most generous in terms of yards; the Bears were last in the Pac Ten in sacks and tackles for loss and a balm for ailing offenses, generally -- six of the last eight opponents scored at or above their season averages against Cal, all but Air Force winners in the process. It wasn‘t pretty by any means:
| Yds./Carry | 1st Down Runs | 10+ Runs | 20+ Runs | |
| 2005 | 3.34 | 85 | 47 | 8 |
| 2006 | 3.79 | 88 | 46 | 9 |
| 2007 | 4.01 | 120 | 61 | 17 |
If there’s anything good to add to that, it’s that the guys who did perform, by and large, return: the top seven tacklers, the top five in tackles for loss, five of the top six in sacks. The guys near the front of all of those categories are the linebackers, Worrell Williams, Anthony Felder and Zack Follett, the most statistically impressive of the three (12.5 tackles for loss, ten in the last seven games, and 5.5 sacks) and the only player on the defense deemed fit by Pac Ten coaches for the all-conference team. Those numbers should revert to the mean based on simple probability; if the "senior leadership" cliché means anything, they’ll be better than that. But the goal for now, at minimum, should be back to normal.
If At First You Don‘t Succeed, Tape, Tape Again. If no team has fallen harder than Cal since last October, no player has fallen harder than Nate Longshore, who went from possible early draft entry to possible benchwarmer. Longshore has the size, the arm and, occasionally, a complete grasp of the offense, which has led to some huge afternoons: he threw fifteen total touchdowns in wins over Minnesota, Arizona State, Oregon State and Oregon in a five-week stretch in 2006; went 20 for 24 and threw three touchdowns in a dismantling of UCLA a few weeks later; and put up a pair of two-touchdown, zero-INT efforts in wins over Tennessee and Oregon last September, where he also completed well over 60 percent of his passes in both games.
But Nate, he gets hurt -- in the first game of 2005, which knocked him out for the season; in the sixth game in 2006, which left him limping around with a more serious ankle injury than anyone let on for the rest of the year; in the fifth game last year, with another ankle injury that obviously affected him the rest of the way -- and when he gets hurt, things turn irrevocably south:
| Before | Games | Comp. % | Yds./Att. | TD | INT | Avg. Rating | Pts./Game |
| 2006 | 6 | 64.9 | 8.98 | 17 | 5 | 164.6 | 39.5 |
| 2007 | 5 | 63.8 | 7.4 | 7 | 2 | 134.1 | 39.4 |
| After | Games | Comp. % | Yds./Att. | TD | INT | Avg. Rating | Pts./Game |
| 2006 | 7 | 56.8 | 7.3 | 7 | 8 | 127.8 | 27.1 |
| 2007 | 7 | 54.8 | 6.5 | 9 | 11 | 101.9 | 22.3 |
Bear fans are understandably impatient to see the transition to the Kevin Riley era, especially after the then-redshirt freshman atoned for his epic boner against Oregon State by replacing Longshore with the Bears down 21-0 in the Armed Forces Bowl and completely dominating the final three quarters (Riley’s 255.4 efficiency rating in that game is truly off the charts, even against Air Force). It didn’t help that Longshore missed most of spring practice while Riley and Brock Mansion worked to close whatever gap still remains. But there’s every indication that if Longshore actually remains healthy -- and Cal’s line was outstanding in pass protection, first in the Pac Ten and third nationally in fewest sacks allowed -- he’s a well-above average quarterback, in corresponding with the Tedford lineage. That is, if his confidence isn’t completely shot at this point.
Overly Optimistic Post-Spring Chatter. "Confidence," or "chemistry," or some related psychological healing, seemed to be the theme in the spring, where the aftertaste of last year’s collapse remained strong. On a couple of occasions, Zack Follett embraced the "new tone" by backing Tedford’s tough love routine:
"Coach Tedford’s on us harder than he’s ever been," Follett said. "He’s reinforcing ‘Tedford’s Law’ around here. When I first got here, I saw how it was. Then two years went by, and I saw how much lenience was being allowed. He kind of recognized that. That’s the No. 1 change that he’s been making.
- - -
…and calling out some of his departed teammates (DeSean*cough*Jackson*cough cough*):
"(Coach Jeff) Tedford has changed his tone. It’s more of a team-oriented approach now," Cal linebacker Zack Follett told the Contra Costa Times. "Last year a lot of our leaders were stars who were young. They didn’t provide leadership. No disrespect to those guys, but sometimes when you have star athletes, it’s hard to be a coach to those kinds of players."
- - -
Tedford agrees, apparently, having shockingly abandoned play calling duties to new offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti, late of a successful stint at Tedford’s old haunt, Fresno State, and a few less distinguished stops in the NFL. If Tedford the All-Seeing Motivator is actually more effective than Tedford the Master Tacticion/Quarterback Manufacturer -- and that’s a long ’if,’ because Tedford’s been very good in the latter role, the second half of last year notwithstanding -- he might yet re-ascend the ’hot commodity’ throne he briefly rode in 2004-06. But then, if Longshore’s lost the team, somebody’s still gotta do the quarterback thing with Riley, so just when you thought you were out, Jeff…
Cal on YouTube. You can learn about the "aging hippies in the oak trees" from Brent Musburger or from local news footage of the infamous, shrieking Dumpster Muffin or from guerilla footage of protesters talking shit to cops in hopes of stirring up some police violence. Or you can get more sober agitprop straight from the well-organized, professional reactionaries’ mouth:
You can get much more of that angle here, here ("I had some friends go to prison and they had a great time") and here, or just gawk at the naked people. (Re: the above-referenced law against building on a fault, see here).
See Also: After centuries of animosity, the famous Bear-Tree throwdown to end it all in the mid-nineties. … A very strange, uh, tribute to Roy "Wrong Way" Riegels. … And Marshawn Lynch takes a little joyride after the Bears’ overtime win over Washington in 2006.
Yes, Nate, of course we see the birdies. We all see them. How’s your ankle? Do you like your new room?
- - -
Best-Case. The running game should be its usual steady self behind Best, which opens up Longshore and/or Riley’s options dramatically. Tedford’s consistent success offensively is too strong to ignore: if Longshore, especially, is healthy and has his teammates’ confidence, this is still a unit that can average in the low 30s. The Bears have two of the league’s most interesting, potentially season-defining non-conference games in September, against Michigan State and at Maryland, with likely victim Washington State in between. If Cal can start 3-0, take three of four against Arizona State, Arizona, UCLA and Oregon, and head into USC at 7-1, the dropoff in degree of difficulty at the end of the schedule offers a fine chance for BCS contention at 10-2. That seems like extreme optimism for a team with so many questions on offense, but beyond the Trojans, there’s nobody that should beat Cal -- these guys were No. 2 in the country as late as October, and if the pieces fall into place, it could shape up as a hell of a rejuvenation job.
Worst-Case. It’s very easy to think "Cal’s always good on offense" and overlook the total death of reliable playmakers; after one great year and a couple good ones, the defense looks like it’s back in the mire for the foreseeable future. There’s really only one ‘break’ in the first ten games, against Colorado State at the end of September. Assuming Cal wins that, it could still be just a 2-2 afterthought hitting the meat of the conference schedule, which is uncommonly tough to predict, and therefore potentially brutal. Through the next six games -- Arizona State, Arizona, UCLA, Oregon, USC and Oregon State -- it’s easy to see the Bears going 2-4, limping into the final two against Stanford and Washington just hoping to eke out bowl eligibility, drop another one to one of the up-and-comers and have to endure the longest offseason here in seven or eight years. That may seem a little extreme, but as high as I was on the Bears’ potential a couple years ago, the pendulum has definitely swung.
Non-Binding Forecast. The shine is definitely off here; the Bears look like just another team in the middle of a very crowded pack in a parity-driven conference that offers up five to six toss-up games, even before factoring in the Michigan State-Maryland gambit in September. Minus a couple fairly obvious games as buffers (a win over Colorado State, a loss at Southern Cal), the schedule breaks down according to three distinct sections: Michigan State-Washington State-Maryland (that looks like a 2-1 start), Arizona State-Arizona-UCLA-Oregon (the Bears might be lucky to split that run) and Oregon State-Stanford-Washington to close. If they beat everyone they’re supposed to beat, including a 3-0 finish against teams they were 0-3 against last year, this looks like an 8-4 kind of season; if there’s another stumble along the way to an Arizona or Washington, it could be 7-5. But unless the defense is hugely improved and a really sound, consistent running game emerges behind Best, there’s no great leap forward.
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
The card stunts aren't faked/digitally enhanced at all...
it’s actually pretty easy.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Jul 8, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
also:
thanks for the assessment!
Basically what it seems like it boils down to is whether the offense “clicks” or not. The D will be standard Tedford Bend But Don’t Break (but still bend) and give up 20-25 points per game. If the offense can churn out 40/game, Cal is set. If not, sunk.
by Spazzy Mcgee on
Jul 8, 2008 2:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wow
Surprisingly good analysis. You really sound like you know the team well.
The defense will be much improved mainly b/c we’re switching to a 3-4 and utilizing more of our fast linebackers to blitz (the strength of our D) . One of our stud DEs Roulon Davis will be back (he was injured most of last season) and he was our x-factor. During the TENN and AZST games you can tell when Roulon was in there we got more pressure on the QB. Plus, our secondary seems to be solidifying with Syd and the monster tackler Ezeff returning. 
“Ezeff, Ezeff, Ezeff…”
Like you point out, the big question is with our WR core. However, based on what I’ve seen of Best and our OL, I’d say that they won’t have to play like stars, they just have to be decent and our run game will carry us. Nate will be healthy again and if he gets hurt we have Riley, or vise-versa.
You forgot to point out what a risk our kicking game is to us. Jordan Kay is only 50% beyond 30yrds and that’s not going to cut it during close games – and it appears we’ll be in at least 4 of them. On the flip side, we might have the strongest punter in the NCAA next year and a gaggle of great return men so I’m hoping our kicking game – at least – has a net neutral effect on our games.
btw: you might be surprised by Michael Calvin. He’s got great hands, he’s big and will be hard to bring down… think Jordy Nelson.
by danzig on
Jul 8, 2008 1:48 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yep, Calvin actually came in with a good deal of hype – 4-stars if I recall and tore it up on the practice team. One aspect not to be overlooked: at WR we are trading experience for size. All of Cal’s likely starters are 6-2+/200+. They should block better and be more effective across the middle than their speedy, diminutive predecessors. I anticipate some rough patches in the first few games, but I think this unit will be productive.
Also don’t forget Vereen at RB. It will be RB by committee with several shifty, speedy options rotating through, tiring out defenses and breaking big ones in the 2H.
by OskiMonsta on
Jul 10, 2008 8:12 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Damn, forgot about Shane. These are good points. Our most consistent pass yardage came from the Hawk across the middle. If we can have 3-4 Hawk like players across the middle our pass game might surprise everyone. Also, as you say, if they can block just for a split second, Best could be breaking some seriously long runs.
by danzig on
Jul 10, 2008 2:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
We always do good card stunts
Not as good as North Korea or anything, but we’ve gotten pretty good at making fun of the opposing team with the cards.
From the early 80s: 
by danzig on
Jul 8, 2008 2:00 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice
Nice review of Cal, now do the Pac 10 champions, ASU.
by FreakinA on
Jul 8, 2008 2:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
What do you Devils think of Nance?
What kind of runner is he? Strengths, weakness?
by danzig on
Jul 8, 2008 2:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Man, I just read somewhere that the Pac10 champs might be ASSu. But I can’t remember where…..
"Save The Oaks: Overthrow Capitalism" said Dumpster Muffin sanguinely
www.CaliforniaGoldenBlogs.com
by TwistNHook on
Jul 8, 2008 5:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
nice job SMQ
I’m pretty much in total agreement. LY I predicted the dire year for Cal-thinking they were weak down the middle on both sides of the ball-which was pretty much true. This year I’m thinking Cal fans will be disappointed with the 3-4—at least in the early going. The “dearth of proven playmakers” thing also will try Tedfords patience.
BTW as an ASU fan it seems doubtful that any team will overthrow SC. And look for Dmitri Nance to get most of the touches at RB for the devils--probably an element of wishful thinking but I expect him to breakout this year-as a Frosh/Soph he was a steady performer.
by baal on
Jul 8, 2008 6:29 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks
Just saw that you put this up. THANK YOU! Now I am going to read it…
by CaliSeth on
Jul 8, 2008 6:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m actually kind of surprised that you’ve not gotten a flood of “hate” mail for telling the truth about Cal’s chances. I know there are a lot of fanbases out there that object when prognosticators predict anything less than a national championship for their teams. Good on Cal for not doing that.
by Alaska Hokie on
Jul 8, 2008 9:32 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
i think it's an entirely reasonable assessment
8-4 sounds about right to me. in my mind, there are 5 games where Cal should be pretty well favored ( WSU, CSU, Arizona, Stanford, and Washington), 1 where we definitely won’t be ( USC), and 6 relative toss-ups (Michigan State, Maryland, Oregon, UCLA, Arizona State, @ Oregon State). Split those down the middle, and 8-4 is about what I’d expect, with 10-2 being fantastic and 6-6 being a disaster.
So, basically, you gotta Go Bears!
by ragnarok on
Jul 9, 2008 1:52 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
@ Alaska
A few years back Cal was winning one game a year, they have made TREMENDOUS strides under tedford and Cal fans are just now getting used to put up lots of victories a year. One of the best program turnarounds I have seen.
by FreakinA on
Jul 8, 2008 10:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Unfortunately the dearth of ...
... proven playmakers noted by SMQ will simply not allow BCS contention and a challange to USC. We’re strong enough at QB, Running Back (assuming JB stays healthy) and D to have very realistic expections of 8 and 4 but anything beyond that will require some luck or some of that Tetford magic.
At this point an 8-4 season would stabilize the program and with some solid recruting (with the usual reliance on the JC guys) we may hope to start challangeing double digit victories with some consistency again.
Excellent analysis SMQ, though no more that we could have expected. Thanks for being so prompt about it as well.
by marcillac on
Jul 8, 2008 10:34 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The first time they came to my attention (other than The Play, of course) was that 2003 Insight Bowl, when Tech and they got into a shootout. It definitely impressed me at the time.
by Alaska Hokie on
Jul 9, 2008 3:02 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Schedule Works In Cal's Favor
One thing that should not be overlooked is the Bears’ schedule. USC is a likely loss, no matter where the game is played, but in even numbered years, Cal gets Oregon, ASU, and UCLA at home. That worked nicely in 2004 and 2006, both 10-win seasons. It might be expecting too much to think that another 10-win season awaits the Bears, but it might put Cal a bit closer to your Best Case scenario than to the Worst Case scenario.
Overall, however, I fear that there are, as you indicate, just too many question marks to all work out favorably. While either Longshore or Riley are capable, the uncertainty over who will lead the team cannot be good. You note the inevitable dropoff at WR. I’m also concerned that, for the first time that I can recall in the Tedford era, there is no clear workhorse RB. Jahvid Best looks sensational, but he is not very big, is coming off a season-ending injury, and has not demonstrated that he can carry the load.
Thanks for responding to the will of the people (or at least to those of us who have seen a few too many tree-huggers for the past 18 months).
by Buffalobear on
Jul 9, 2008 12:00 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
one other thing
Team psyche—Cal definitely lost it’s mojo after getting beat by OSU and ASU. The early season will tell the tale in this game.
by baal on
Jul 9, 2008 11:19 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It all boils down to D
I think Cal will have a productive offense as usual, although there will be some rough patches as the new skill players find their feet. The speed and talent is there, but don’t assume it will all “click” from day one. A 230 lb. hammer-type RB is missing, which could hurt in short yardage (Taofou is a nice option here but seems consistently underutilized), but otherwise the pieces are there.
Which brings me to the D. IMHO, this unit has generally underperformed with the notable exception of 2004. It has lived off TOs and seems to have a penchant for giving up big plays at the worst possible time. Last year’s jelly-belly D was predictable – few returning starters outside LB. Now the coin has flipped. Plenty of returning experience, so we should see a significantly improved unit. If not, this should be Gregory’s last year.
Go Bears!
by OskiMonsta on
Jul 10, 2008 8:20 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs


