Sunday Morning Quarterback: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: On Bobby in the Box Score Bar-right-arrows



The Games: Missouri vs. Illinois

The most interesting matchups of the season, chronologically.
- - -

The Stakes (We Think): Neither is a favorite to win its conference’s automatic bid, but Illinois was in the BCS last year and everyone seems to think Missouri should have been, so at-large positioning will be at a premium. No, winning here ultimately didn’t help the Tigers’ case last year, but the odds of the second-place team in the North running the table again outside of Mizzou (especially with the markedly increased difficulty of Kansas’ schedule) are somewhere between zero and none. The winner becomes an immediate favorite for one of the four open slots in January, and may generate some buzz for much greater goals.

Along the same lines, Missouri will open the season in the top ten and has a fairly clear path to 6-0 and probably some substantial mythical championship buzz, depending on the nature of the win; Illinois is likely in the top 20 to start, with an eye on the top ten after a mild upset and the confidence to go forward as a heavy hitter in the conference, with any lingering notions of one-hit wonderism thoroughly smashed. But because both teams are nouveau riche, those suspicions have a lot of relevancy for the loser –– this goes double for Illinois, still carrying the mark of its Rose Bowl beating, and of the Big Ten’s general image problem, and with longer odds than Mizzou to recover quickly with a long winning streak: the Illini only have two games between the Tigers and back-to-back games at Penn State and Michigan. They could disappear from the national discussion very quickly.


Eddie McGee's recurring nightmare.
- - -

Stars, Themes, Petty Grievances and Other Reasons to Watch. If only we’d known anything about these teams’ fates then, their game last September could have been a classic –– a H*i*m*n finalist; the Big Ten player of the year wild momentum swings via touchdowns on a blocked punt, a 100-yard fumble return and a punt return; over 70 points and almost 900 yards offense; and a near-comeback from 24 points down led by a backup quarterback that didn’t fall short until the dying seconds. All between teams that would still be playing into the New Year. This is a perfect interstate clash to open the season, anyway, shrewdly set in St. Louis, spanning both sides of the river, that can be worked into a fine little tradition along the lines of Oklahoma-Texas in the Cotton Bowl, the Cocktail Party in Jacksonville, etc. Throwdowns between programs that largely dominate big, adjacent states, at a convenient neutral site, have a lot of caché, all the moreso when the stakes are ostensibly higher and the level of firepower is what it is on these rosters.

Last year’s game belonged to the quarterbacks –– Chase Daniel threw for 359, three touchdowns and no picks; Eddie McGee and Juice Williams combined for 316 and one touchdown –– but Illinois suffered dramatically from losing Juice Williams in the second quarter. His first series, McGee’s fumble at the Tigers’ two yard-line (his second in four plays) led to a 13-point swing when Pig Brown took the loose ball the length of the field, and the comeback he largely facilitated was sunk when McGee threw interceptions on each of the Illini’s last two drives. A full-time, healthy and more well-rounded Juice offers a much better chance to keep up with Missouri’s fireworks instead of sprinting from behind with no margin for error.

The Early Edge. There’s a fair degree of disagreement about Illinois, which seems strong enough with Williams and Arrelious Benn in tow and a lot of up-and-coming talent from Zook’s strong recruiting classes, but which also lost its best players (Rashard Mendenhall, J Leman) on both sides. There are no such questions about Missouri’s lineup: with Daniel and Jeremy Maclin and the overwhelming majority of last year’s defense back, any regression to the mediocre Mizzou of the past decade would be a colossal disappointment. If these teams were virtually equal last year, the difference in August is that the Tigers have their engine (Daniel), and the Illini, minus Mendenhall, do not. As many points as Missouri can put up, and is fully expected to, this is no occasion to be working out kinks.

0 recs | Comment 4 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

I think a lot is going to hinge on Illinois’s penchant for taking stupid, stupid penalties. If not for that (and two muffed punts), they probably would have beaten Michigan last year. If they can overcome that sort of sloppiness, they have a reasonable chance of staying in the BCS discussion for a while. If not … I don’t think they fall back to the ‘05-’06 pratfall days, but repeating last year’s results is just not going to happen.

by SpartanDan on Jun 24, 2008 5:07 PM EDT   0 recs

They need a running back badly. No one has even looked remotely capable yet alone on Mendenhall’s level.

by gahnki on Jun 24, 2008 5:22 PM EDT to parent up   0 recs

Benn was a beast last year at the dome, but...

this was also pre-Maclin mania. Eddie McGee came in and gave Illannoy the spark for awhile, and Mizzou killed Juice. I’m hoping Eddie McGee never sees the field because Juice can’t beat us on his own. Without Mendenhall, the Illini will hurt.

http://www.Mizzourah.net

by Big Head on Jun 24, 2008 7:49 PM EDT   0 recs

Aside from the one TD run, Mizzou held Mendenhall

VERY much in check…I think to less than 50 yards in the game. I very much agree on the Juice/McGee thing…Mizzou’s defense (not real good at that point, certainly more lucky than anything until the Neb game) did not have a book on McGee, but had done pretty welll with Juice to that point. I think the Ill offense will be about the same as last year without Mendenhall, but the Mizzou defense is clearly improved since that time last season.

"Write a wise saying and your name will live forever." - Anonymous

by The Beef on Jun 25, 2008 9:16 AM EDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SMQ is not journalism, but it does need your tips! Loyal readers who see anything of timely interest, incredible brilliance or earth-shattering sublimity, drop me a line -- sundaymorningqb-at-yah00, etc. You won't be sorry.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
College Football Question: Thursday Night Football
Small
CBS Leaks Future NCAA TV Games
Small
The New Location for SMQ!
Small
Badgers Preview 08'
Small
Purdue Pre-Season Underway
Rockmnation_small
Beyond the Box Score: SEC Edition (Part Two)
Rockmnation_small
Beyond the Box Score: SEC edition (Part One)
Jim-tressel-ohio-state_small
The Coaches Poll
Small
Who's the Man: Stafford vs. Tebow
Small
College Football Question: Saturday Night Football

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter