Sunday Morning Quarterback: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





Retro Bowl Bubble

As the official bowl slotting freak around here, I couldn't resist.  With the announcement of 2 new bowls for 2008, what would have been the effects on the 2007 matchups if they'd existed?

OK, to recap, there were 7 bowl-eligible teams that didn't get to play in an extra game: Troy, Louisville, South Carolina, Iowa, Northwestern, Ohio and ULM.

And there are 2 new games.  Let's start with the easier one: The St. Petersburg Bowl matches a Big East and a C-USA team.  This is the C-USA team that used to be in the PapaJohns.com Bowl, which is now Big East-SEC.  I'm assuming that the St. Pete Bowl, with the C-USA tie-in, picks ahead of the International Bowl, with the MAC.  That gives you the following matchups for last year:

PapaJohn's.com Bowl: Cincinnati vs. South Carolina
St. Petersburg Bowl: Rutgers vs. Southern Mississippi
International Bowl: Louisville vs. Ball State

Okay, now the Congressional Bowl.  That one is supposed to match the #9 ACC team vs. a service academy.  It's Navy in 2008, Army in 2009, and who knows after that.  And the MAC has a spot as a backup if either spot doesn't get filled.

What does that mean for 2007?  Well, just for argument's sake, we'll put Navy in there and go with the 2008 matchup for the Poinsettia Bowl (where Navy had a deal), which is the #7 Pac-10 team.

Now, there wasn't a #9 ACC team or a #7 Pac-10 eligible last year.  So that means the MAC gets to cover the Congressional Bowl, and the open slot in the Poinsettia goes to the only team left at better than 6-6

Congressional Bowl: Ohio vs. Navy
Poinsettia Bowl: Utah vs. Troy

Still left out: Iowa, Northwestern, ULM.

All right, now just for fun, what if the other proposed bowl, the Rocky Mountain Bowl (which sounded like all they had was some guy who said "Hey, why not have a bowl in Salt Lake City?") had been around.  That one would have matched Mountain West vs. WAC.  

I'm assuming that given this option, the Mountain West would have let poor New Mexico travel to a game (although they did play at Utah and TCU didn't, so maybe not).  The WAC didn't have another team available, so now we have 3 open slots: Texas, Poinsettia and Rocky Mountain.

I've never figured out how it actually works when you have an undesirable 7-5 team (Troy) that has to get a spot, and 6-6 teams that are more desirable.  I'm guessing that everybody cuts deals until one bowl's left.  And traveling to SLC in December to play New Mexico is the loser there.  So, in this version you get:

Poinsettia Bowl: Utah vs. Northwestern (Iowa didn't want to go to a game during exams)
New Mexico Bowl: TCU vs. Nevada
Texas Bowl: Iowa vs. Houston
Rocky Mountain Bowl: New Mexico vs. Troy

That leaves just ULM, but hey, they beat Alabama!  They're happy.

All comments on 'Sunday Morning Quarterback' are the views of the individual commenter and do not necessarily reflect the genius of SMQ, Sports Blog Nation, etc.

0 recs | Comment 3 comments | Add your comment

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

bowl
I'm glad there are two more bowl games. Some people complain that they are watered down and no one watches them, but I watched a good 12 bowl games last year.

I just wish the bowl games were more spread out so we could have an entire month of college football.

by gahnki on May 3, 2008 1:40 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Good and bad
More football is never a bad thing per se, but I do agree that getting to a bowl game doesn't mean much anymore.  Especially if you are in a BCS conference, if you go through a 5 year period without making a bowl game you're not even trying at this point.  (Which makes my rival arizona's decade-long drought all the sweeter!)

That said, my main complaint is the way some of the upstart bowls are pushing their way later and later in the season.    Let's keep the also-ran specials early in the year, load up on the better and more legitimate games for New Year's Day, and have nothing but the BCS games after Jan 1.  

by Beatuofa on May 5, 2008 3:07 PM EDT reply reply   0 recs

Let me point out...
We're talking the #9 ACC team?  Are you kidding me?  We're talking 9 out of 12 teams in a conference making a bowl?  They haven't even qualified 9 teams recently.  Hell the SEC and Big10 barely did (toss that up to home games and cupcakes).  Ludicrous.  

I for one would support at least more games if they were spread out over the month of December.  But since these will be in the same stretch creating more games being played at the same time, and less I'll watch.  

Are either of these being horded by NFL network so at least I'll have an excuse not to watch them?

by formerlyanonymous on May 6, 2008 11:38 AM EDT reply reply   0 recs


User Tools

SMQ is not journalism, but it does need your tips! Loyal readers who see anything of timely interest, incredible brilliance or earth-shattering stupidity are instructed to abjugate their shyness. Share the wealth: sundaymorningqb - at - yahoo, etc.
Ad-medium-smq

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Galagaship_small
Welcome to the new Sunday Morning Quarterback and SB Nation

Recent FanPosts

King_small
Clemson=No Respect?
Snapshot_2008-05-09_03-11-55_small
Letter to a Young Procrastinator
Small
An Idea about post-season
Small
Retro Bowl Bubble
Snapshot_2008-05-09_03-11-55_small
Another Proud Moment
Gator-f__custom__small
Ohio State and Playoffs
Snapshot_2008-05-09_03-11-55_small
Homerism: For What It's Worth
Small
TDs: The Runs Batted In of College Football (Part Three)
Small
Subjectivity is not necessary

Post New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Ad-banner-faketeams
Site Meter