Thoughtful answers - I'd expect no less from a fellow schlub, but here's five more for you.  Answer in comments, send me an email, or post. I couldn't care less. But I'm interested in your thoughts.

1. How difficult do you think it is to avoid power pollage when you attempt to rank strictly on resume? I ask you, specifically, because 1) you went with a preseason power poll of sorts, 2) you now attempt to rank your ballot strictly by resume (which is not to say you were wrong to do so), and 3) you've thought about the distinction between the two extensively. The short question would be: how difficult do you find it to be in ranking strictly on resume?
2. Is it even possible to avoid some amount of power polling? Let's take this to the next level. I ask you because, well, because you're thoughtful enough to sort through it: What if, as an example, Tennessee had tanked after their whipping of Cal. But Cal still improved as much as they have since week one. Does it affect Cal's resume? Should it?
3. As much crap as the BCS has gotten, it seems to be an improvement over the old system, in my view. Agree?
4. Should margin of victory be allowed in computer polls?
5. Who you callin a schlub?

Okay, that's a lot to digest. So maybe just tuck em away for whenever. Maybe the offseason is the time to wax philosophical about these things. I got rather into these questions over the past offseason, and your Five Questions guest spot got my battery charged again.

PB